返回搜索
Logo Pic

灰褶鹅膏

Amanita griseofolia

 

Zhu L.Yang 2004

基本信息 General Info.

  • 通用中文名Chinese name:灰褶鹅膏
  • 拉丁学名Scientific name:Amanita griseofolia Zhu L.Yang 2004
  • 科Family:鹅膏科Amanitaceae
  • 属Genus:鹅膏属Amanita
  • 分布Distribution:亚洲:中国、韩国、印度
  • 有分布的省区Provinces:云南、北京、吉林、河南、湖南、海南、西藏、南京、上海、广东、台湾
  • 生态Ecology:夏秋季生于针阔混交林、阔叶林或针叶林地表,常散生。
  • 营养类型Nutrition Type:外生菌根共生Ectomycorrhizal:和植物形成菌根共生关系,且菌丝在幼根表面形成菌丝套
  • 置信指标Confidence:★★★

物种介绍

DefaultPicture

来源:卷柏

灰褶鹅膏是2004年发表的物种,隶属于鞘托鹅膏组,分布于亚洲地区。该物种在我国的分布广泛,从吉林到海南均有分布,但过去常被错误鉴定为圈托鹅膏Amanita ceciliae[1]

形态特征

灰褶鹅膏拥有鞘托组的一般特征:菌盖边缘有沟纹;小菌褶近横截;菌柄无菌环,基部不膨大;菌肉缺乏锁状联合。但灰褶鹅膏的菌盖上有鳞片,同时菌柄基部不形成袋状菌托,这两个特征在组内较为特殊。

灰褶鹅膏的其他重要特征包括:菌盖灰色至褐灰色,表面覆盖灰色至深灰色颗粒状、毡毛状或粉状,鳞片易脱落;菌褶幼年白色,成年后略带灰色,干燥后变灰色;菌柄上有灰色纤丝状鳞片,基部无成型菌托,仅有排列成不完整圈的鳞片;担孢子近球形,非淀粉质。

[1][2]

相似物种

圈托鹅膏Amanita ceciliae是一个欧洲物种,和灰褶鹅膏近缘[3],亦是灰褶鹅膏常被错误鉴定为的物种。真正的圈托鹅膏在我国尚未发现分布,它的特征是担子果粗壮得多,菌盖常带有明显黄褐色、红褐色或橄榄褐色调,菌盖表面鳞片颜色更淡,菌褶白色,菌柄更粗,菌柄基部形态不同,担孢子略大。[1]

李逵鹅膏Amanita liquii是一个在我国有分布的同组相似物种。其体型更大、明显更粗壮多肉,菌盖10-14cm宽(本物种约3-7cm宽),深褐色至近黑色;菌盖表面鳞片毡状至疣状,更厚且颜色更深;菌柄1.5-3cm宽(本物种约0.5-1.5cm宽),表面鳞片颜色更深;多分布在高海拔针叶林中(本物种多见于中地海拔针叶、阔叶或混交林中)。[1]

物种介绍-参考文献
1. Two new species of Amanita (Basidiomycota) from China. 2004. Zhu L. Yang. Agerer R, Piepenbring M, Blanz P (eds) Frontiers in Basidiomycete mycology. IHW Verlag, Eching, pp 315–324    
2. 云南野生菌. 2022. 杨祝良、王向华、吴刚编著. 北京:科学出版社    
3. The family Amanitaceae: molecular phylogeny, higher-rank taxonomy and the species in China. 2018. Cui, Y.-Y., Cai, Q., Tang, L.-P., Liu, J.-W., & Yang, Z. L.. Fungal Diversity, 91(1), 5–230.    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0405-9

食毒性

可食用Edible

食毒性文献记载

食用性原文描述参考文献
可食用经济价值 可食;树木外生菌根菌。中国鹅膏科真菌图志

物种描述

文献中物种描述

  • 以下描述摘自相关参考文献,由文字识别而来,请以原文为准。
  • 部分文献可能存在描述过时、描述错误或者描述片面等情况,仅供参考。
  • 外文描述的参考翻译系AI翻译或人工翻译,仅供参考。

描述 1 来源:Two new species of Amanita (Basidiomycota) from China

类型:原白(物种发表时的原始描述)

Amanita griseofolia Zhu L . Yang , sp . nov . Fig1-7
Amanita ceciliae sensu Zhu L . Yang , Biblioth . Mycol .170:116,1997, p . p .
Pileus 3-7(10.5) cm diametro , convexus vel applanatus , obscure umbonatus vel non - umbonatus , griseo - brun - neus vel brunneo - griseus , non luteus , non flavus , non ochraceus , margine sulcata (0.2-0.4R), non appendiculata , eliuiis volvae coactis , flocculosis vel verrucosis , griseis vel atrogriseis ornatus . Lamellae liberae , griseolae vel griseae , confertae ; lamellulae truncatae . Stipes (6)8-17x0.5-1.5 cm , subcylindricus vel sursum attenuatus , haud bulbosus , albidus , cavus , squamellis griseis , fibrilloseis vel farinoseis , exannulatus , volvatus . Volva grisea vel atrogrisea , verrucolosa . Caro albida . Basidia 4- sporigera . Basidiosporae (9.5)10.0-13.5(16.5) x (8.5)9.5-13.0(15.0) um , globosae vel subglobosae , non amyloideae . Fibulae absentes .
Holotype : China , Yunnan , Kunming , Heilongtan ,1980 m asl ., on soil in forest dominated by Quercus sp ., Pinus armandi , and P . yunnanensis ,27.6.2001, Z . L . Yang 3081( HKAS 38159).
Etymology : griseofolia - referring to the greyish to grey lamellae.
Basidiocarps ( Figs .1,5-7) small to medium - sized , rarely large . Pileus 3-7(10.5) cm diam , at first nearly campanulate to hemispherical , then convex to plano - convex , without an umbo or slightly um - bonate , brownish grey to grey - brown [ Natal Brown , Buffy Brown , Snuff Brown , Medal Bronze ,4B1-2,5C2-4,5D2-4,5E3-5], darker over disc , becoming somewhat paler towards the margin , lacking any yellow or ochreous tint at all stages of development ; margin tuberculate - striate (0.20-0.43R), non - appendiculate ; volval remnants grey to dark grey [ Iron Gray , somewhat darker than Smoke Gray ,4C1-2,4D1-2,4E1-2], verrucous to felty or farinose , sometimes irregularly formed ,0.5-1.5 mm thick , easily washed away by rain ; trama thin ,2-5 mm thick , white to whitish , unchan - ging . Lamellae free , crowded , whitish [ Cream Color , IAI -2J, but soon becoming greyish to grey [ Pale Smoke Gray to Light Drab , paler than 5D2], often becoming somewhat darker when dried ; lamellar edges grey to dark grey [ Iron Gray , darker than Smoke Gray ,4E1-2,5E1-3]; lamellulae truncate to subtruncate , plentiful , evenly distributed . Stipe (6)8-17 x 0.5-1.5 cm , subcylindric or slightly tapering upward , with apex slightly expanded , white to dirty white , lower half covered with grey to greyish [ Pale Smoke Gray ,4D2] fibrillose squamules , upper half densely covered with grey farinose squamules , fistulous ; context white to dirty white , unchanging ; basal bulb lacking ; volval remnants felty to granular or verrucous , grey to dark grey [ Iron Gray , Smoky Gray , Drab ,4E1-2,SE1-3], arranged irregularly or sometimes in incomplete belts or rings at stipe base . Annulus lacking . Smell indistinct .
Lamellar trama ± bilateral. Mediostratum 30–40 μm wide, composed of fairly abundant, long ellipsoid to subfusiform inflated cells (70–90 × 15–20 μm) and abundant interwoven, often anastomosing, 3–7 μm wide filamentous hyphae; vascular hyphae rare. Lateral stratum composed of fairly abundant, long ellipsoid to subfusiform inflated cells (40–60 × 10–15 μm), diverging at an angle of ca. 30° to mediostratum; filamentous hyphae fairly abundant to abundant, 3–7 μm wide, frequently branching, interwoven, sometimes anastomosing; vascular hyphae rare, 3–9 μm wide. Subhymenium (Fig. 2) 30–50 μm thick, with 2–3(4) layers of subglobose to ovoid or shortly ellipsoid cells, 12–25 × 10–20 μm, occasionally mixed with hardly inflated cells. Basidia (Fig. 2) 40–70 × 15–20 μm, clavate, 4-spored; sterigmata 5–7 μm long; basal septa without clamps. Basidiospores (Fig. 3) [456/28/22] (9.5)10.0–13.5(16.5) × (8.5)9.5–13.0(15.0) μm [Q = 1.0–1.10(1.18), Q = 1.04 ± 0.03], globose to subglobose, rarely broadly ellipsoid, inamyloid, colorless, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth; apiculus ca. 1 μm long. Lamellar edge as sterile, gelatinized, yellow-brown strip up to 250 μm wide in side view, predominantly composed of ovoid to subglobose, sometimes sphaeropedunculate inflated cells (20–50 × 15–35 μm), single and terminal or in chains of 2–3, colorless and hyaline, or with yellowish brown vacuolar pigments; filamentous hyphae fairly abundant to scattered, 2–7 μm wide, colorless and hyaline, sometimes with brownish vacuolar pigments, irregularly arranged or running parallel to the lamellar edge, elements embedded in yellow-brown amorphous matrix gradually disappearing in KOH. Pileipellis 50–100 μm thick; upper layer (20–60 μm thick) strongly gelatinized, composed of ± radially and moderately compactly arranged, 1–4 μm wide, thin-walled, colorless or brownish vacuolar pigmented filamentous hyphae; lower layer (30–50 μm thick) composed of radially and compactly arranged, 3–8(15) μm wide filamentous hyphae with brownish yellow, vacuolar pigments; terminal cells present, 5–10 μm wide, hardly inflated; vascular hyphae rare. Volval remnants on pileus (Fig. 4) composed of ± vertically (over disc) to irregularly (on other parts of the pileus) arranged elements. Inflated cells very abundant to dominant, subglobose, ovoid to shortly ellipsoid (20–70 × 15–50 μm), sometimes broadly clavate (40–60 × 20–30 μm) or sphaeropedunculate (50–80 × 25–45 μm), often in chains of 2–3 and then terminal, thin- to slightly thick-walled (up to 0.5 μm thick), often with brownish yellow vacuolar pigments; filamentous hyphae scattered to fairly abundant, 2–7 μm wide, frequently branching , often anastomosing , thin - walled , colorless and hyaline , sometimes with brownish yellow vacuolar pigments ; vascular hyphae rare ,2-8 μm wide . Volval remnants on stipe base similar to those on the pileus , but inflated cells and filamentous hyphae irregularly arranged . Stipe trama composed primarily of longitudinally arranged , long clavate , terminal cells ,250-350x 25-40μm ; filamentous hyphae 2-7μm wide , scattered ( in interior ) or abundant ( on stipe surface ); vascular hyphae rare ,2-10 um wide . Clamps absent in fruitbody .
Specimens examined : CHINA , Beijing , Tanzhesi , on soil ,25.7.1958, S . C . Teng 6063( HMAS 22610); Beijing , Tanzhesi , on soil ,29.7.1959, W . X . Wang and X . L . Kong 74( HMAS 26499); Hainan , Changjiang , Bawangling ,1350 m asl ., on soil in broad - leaved forest ,24.8.1990, Q . Chen ( GDGM 16689); Hainan , Ledong , Jianfengling ,900 m asl ., on soil in broad - leaved forest ,25.9.1987, Z . S . Bi and T . H . Li ( GDGM 12414); Henan , Shiziping , on soil ,26.8.1968, H . Z . Li et al .162b( HMAS 35975b); Jilin , Antu , Changbaishan ,1750 m asl ., on soil ,5.8.1960, Y . C . Yang et al .564( HMAS 29135); Jilin , Antu , Changbaishan , no date , Z . X . Xie 820373( IFP ); Xizang ( Tibet ), Bomi , Galongla ,3000 m asl ., on soil in forest ,24.8.1982, X . L . Mao 227( HMAS 51439). Yunnan , Chuxiong , Zixishan ,2400 m asl ., on soil under trees of Lithocarpus sp . and Pinus armandi ,2.8.2001, Z . L . Yang 3144( HKAS 38321); Yunnan , Guangnan , Maojie ,1500 m asl .,27.6.1959, Q . Z . Wang 688( HMAS 26498); Yunnan , Kunming ,17.6.1973, Y . C . Zong et al .155( HMAS 36284); Yunnan , Kunming , on soil ,30.6.1973, Q . M . Ma et al .285 and Y . C . Zong et al .285( HMAS 36036 and 37441 respectively ); Yunnan , Kunming , Dapiji , on soil under trees of Quercus sp .,8.7.1942, W . F . Chiu 8216( HMAS 4216); Yunnan , Kunming , Heilongtan ,21.8.1987, Y . Xuan 1385( HKAS 18318); Yunnan , Kunming , Heilongtan ,1980 m asl ., on soil in foret dominated by Quercus sp ., Pinus armandi , and P . yunnanensis ,27.6.2001, Z . L . Yang 3081( HKAS 38159, HOLOTYPE ); Yunnan , Kunming , Heilongtan , on soil in forest with species of Quercus and Pinus ,30.6.1991, Z . L . Yang 1074( HKAS 24219); Yunnan , Kunming , Heilongtan ,1980 m asl ., on soil under trees of Picea sp .,4.9.1999, Z . L . Yang 2628( HKAS 34081); Yunnan , Kunming , Jindian ,1700 m asl ., on soil ,29.9.1995, Z . L . Yang 2199( HKAS 29630); Yunnan , Kunming , Jindian , on soil under Pinus sp .,4.8.1995, M . Wang 3( HKAS 32507); Yunnan , Songming , Liangyushan , on soil in forest ,17.9.1979, G . H . Feng 13( HKAS 4646); Yunnan , Yingjiang , Xima ,1700 m asl ., on soil under trees of Lithocarpus sp .,16.7.2003, Z . L . Yang 3708( HKAS 42894).
Notes : Amanita griseofolia , a member of Amanita subgenus Amanita section Vaginatae ( Fr .) Qu é l . in the sense of YANG (1997), is characterized by its small to medium - sized , slender fruitbody with grey to dark grey , felty to verrucose or farinose , easily removed volval remnants on a grey , dark grey to brownish grey pileus , greyish to grey lamellae , a slender greyish stipe , felty to granular or verru - cose , grey to dark grey volval remnants in incomplete belts around the non - bulbous stipe base , and globose to subglobose , inamyloid basidiospores .
HKAS 4646,18318,24219, and 32507, as well as HMAS 4216 and 36284 were regarded as A . ceciliae by YANG (1997). However , A . ceciliae ( Berk . et Broome ) Bas , originally described from Europe , differs from A . griseofolia by its much more robust fruitbody with a yellow - brown , reddish brown to grey - brown or olive - brown pileus covered with lighter colored ( greyish to brownish ) volval remnants , white lamellae with white edges , and a relatively thicker stipe . Furthermore , the volval rem - nants at the base of the stipe of A . ceciliae often form a ring - zone above a strangulate region and a floccose , nearly cupulate structure at the very base of the stipe ( PHILLIPS 1990, Breitenbach & Kr ä nzlin 1995), and there are more filamentous hyphae in the volval remnants of European A . ce - ciliae [ France , Jura , near Noga ,2.10.1992, C . Bas 9341( L )] than in A . griseofolia . The basidio - spores of A . ceciliae are slightly larger than those of A . griseofolia ( TULLOSS , OVREBO & HALLING 1992, BREITENBACH & KR ä nzlin 1995).
Amanita griseofolia is also similar to A . beckeri Huijsman ex Huijsman , A . cinctipes Corner et Bas , A . sororcula Tulloss , Ovrebo et Halling , and A . liquii Zhu L . Yang , M . Wei ß et Oberw . However , Amanita beckeri , originally described from Europe , differs from A . griseofolia by its differently colored pileus , white volval remnants browning in age , but never becoming grey or darker , white to crcam lamellae with brownish spots in age , and smaller basidiospores ( HUIJSMAN 1962a,1962b, TuLLoss 1994).
Amanita cinctipes , originally described from Singapore , is distinguished from A . griseofolia by its abundant volval remnants on the base of the stipe forming 2-4 rings , much thinner pileipellis , smaller basidia , and smaller basidiospores ( CORNER & BAS 1962).
Amanita sororcula , originally described from Colombia , South America , differs from A . griseo - folia by its smaller fruitbody , thinner pileipellis with common vascular hyphae , and somewhat smaller and less perfectly globose basidiospores ( TULLOSS , OvREBO & HALLING 1992).
Amanita liquii , originally described from southwestern China , differs from A . griseofolia by its larger , much more robust and fleshier fruitbody with a dark brown to blackish pileus covered with thicker and darker volval remnants , thicker pileipellis , somewhat larger basidia , and larger basidio - spores . Furthermore , the pigment in the cells of volval remnants of A . liquii is much darker than the similarly located pigment in A . griseofolia , and the volval remnants at the stipe base of A . liquii are more abundant than those of A . griseofolia ( YANG , WEISS & OBERWINKLER 2004).

描述 2 来源:中国鹅膏科真菌图志

类型:完整的描述(摘录自专著、论文等)

菌盖直径3~7(9)cm,扁半球形至平展,中央无凸起或稍凸起;菌盖表面灰色、暗灰色至褐灰色,具灰色至深灰色易脱落的粉质颗粒状至毡状菌幕残余;菌盖边缘具沟纹(0.2~0.5R)。菌褶幼时污白色,成熟时淡灰色;褶缘色较深,干后变为灰色至深灰色;短菌褶近菌柄端多平截。菌柄长(6)8~16cm,直径0.5~1.5cm,细长,白色至污白色,下半部被灰色纤丝状鳞片,上半部被灰色粉末状鳞片,内部空心,基部不膨大,无球状体;菌环阙如;菌幕残余(菌托)灰色至深灰色粉质,排列不规则或有时呈带状。

描述 3 来源:中国真菌志 第27卷 鹅膏科

类型:完整的描述(摘录自专著、论文等)

灰褶鹅膏 图44
Amanita griseofolia Zhu L. Yang, Frontiers in Basidiomycote Mycology: 315, Figs. 1~7, 2004.
Amanita ceciliae sensu Zhu L. Yang, Biblioth. Mycol. 170: 116, 1997, p. p.; non A. ceciliae (Berk. & Broome) Bas, Persoonia 12: 192, 1984.
担子果小型至中等。菌盖直径3~7(9)cm,初期钟形至半球形,后期平展,中央无凸起或稍凸起,灰色、暗灰色至褐灰色,无黄色色调,具灰色至深灰色易脱落的粉质颗粒状至毡状菌幕残余,湿时稍黏;边缘具棱纹(0.2~0.4R)。菌肉白色,在菌盖中央厚2~5 mm。菌褶离生,成熟时浅灰色,褶缘色较深,较密,不等长,干后变为灰色至深灰色;短菌褶近菌柄端多平截。菌柄长(6)8~16 cm,粗0.5~1.5 cm,细长,近圆柱形,白色至污白色,下半部被灰色、纤丝状鳞片,上半部被灰色、粉状鳞片,内部空心,基部不膨大,无球状体。菌柄基部菌幕残余(菌托)灰色至深灰色粉质,不规则排列,有时呈带状。菌环缺如。
菌褶多少两侧型:中央菌髓宽约30(40)μm,由菌丝(直径3~7 μm)和椭圆形至近梭形的膨大细胞(70~90×15~20 μm)构成;侧生菌髓不明显。亚子实层厚30~50 μm,由2~3(4)层近球形、卵状至短椭圆形的膨大细胞(12~25×10~20 μm)组成。担子45~70×15~20 μm,棒状,具4小梗;小梗长5~7 μm;担子基部横隔上无锁状联合。担孢子(9.5)10.0~13.5(16.5)×(8.5)9.5~13.0(15.0)μm [Q = 1.0~1.10(1.18),Q = 1.04±0.03],球形至近球形,非淀粉质,无色,光滑,薄壁;侧生小尖长约1 μm。褶缘(侧面观)有宽达250 μm的不育带,由菌丝和膨大细胞构成:膨大细胞非常丰富,卵状至近球形,有时球头短柄状,20~50×15~35 μm,无色,壁薄,或有时有黄褐色胞内色素,单个顶生或2~3个连成念珠状;菌丝较丰富,直径2~7 μm,无色,不规则排列,有时其走向与褶缘大致平行。菌盖表皮厚50~100 μm,其中上层厚约20~60 μm,强烈胶化,由近辐射状排列较为疏松的菌丝组成,菌丝直径1~4 μm,无色或有浅褐色胞内色素;下层厚30~50 μm,由紧密多少近辐射状排列的菌丝组成,菌丝直径3~8(15)μm,常有褐黄色胞内色素。菌盖表面菌幕残余由近纵向排列(菌盖中央)至不规则排列(菌盖其他部分)的菌丝和膨大细胞构成:膨大细胞非常丰富,近球形、卵形至短椭圆形(20~70×15~50 μm),有时宽棒状(40~60×20~30 μm),有时球头短柄状(50~80×25~45 μm),壁厚达0.5 μm,常有黄褐色至褐色胞内色素,常2~3个连成念珠状;菌丝稀疏至较丰富,直径2~7 μm,无色或有时有褐黄色胞内色素。菌柄基部的菌幕残余结构与菌盖表面的相似,但菌丝和膨大细胞不规则排列。菌柄菌髓主要由纵向排列的长棒状的膨大细胞(250~350×25~40 μm)构成,其间夹杂的菌丝稀少(菌柄内部)至较多(菌柄表面),直径2~7 μm。子实体无锁状联合。
模式产地:中国(云南)。
生境:生壳斗科、松科植物组成的林中地上。
研究标本:北京:潭柘寺,1958年7月25日,邓叔群6063(HMAS 22610);潭柘寺,1959年7月29日,王维兴、孔显良74(HMAS 26499)。吉林:安图,长白山,时间不详,谢支锡820373(IFP);同上,海拔1750 m,1960年8月5日,杨玉川等564(HMAS 29135)。河南:狮子坪,1968年8月26日,李惠中等162b(HMAS 35975b)。湖南:永顺,1975年6月4日,无名氏(MHHNU 1235);长沙,1984年5月,无名氏(MHHNU 4450);长沙,1984年7月,无名氏(MHHNU 4188)。海南:乐东,尖峰岭,1987年9月25日,毕志树、李泰辉(HMIGD 12414);昌江,霸王岭,1990年8月24日,陈庆(HMIGD 16689)。云南:楚雄,紫溪山,2001年8月2日,杨祝良3144(HKAS 38321);广南,猫街,海拔1500 m,1959年6月27日,王庆之688(HMAS 26498);昆明,1973年6月30日,马启明等285(HMAS 36036)、宗毓臣等285(HMAS 37441);昆明,1973年6月17日,宗毓臣等155(HMAS 36284);昆明,大普吉,1942年7月8日,W. F. Chiu 8216 [HMAS 4216(清华8216)];昆明,金殿,1995年8月4日,王明3(HKAS 32507);同上,1995年9月29日,杨祝良2199(HKAS 29630);昆明,黑龙潭,1991年6月30日,杨祝良1074(HKAS 24219);同上,1999年9月4日,杨祝良2628(HKAS 34081);同上,2001年6月27日,杨祝良3081(HKAS 38159,主模式);同上,1987年8月21日,宣宇1385(HKAS 18318);嵩明,梁玉山,1979年9月17日,冯桂华13(HKAS 4646);盈江,昔马,海拔1700 m,2003年7月16日,杨祝良3708(HKAS 42894)。西藏:波密,嘎隆拉,海拔3000 m,1982年8月24日,卯晓岚227(HMAS 51439)。
世界分布:中国。
讨论:灰褶鹅膏 A. griseofolia 的主要特征是:担子果小型至中等;菌盖灰色、暗灰色至褐灰色,无黄色色调,具灰色至褐灰色易脱落的粉质颗粒状至毡状菌幕残余,菌肉较薄;菌褶浅灰色,干后变为灰色至深灰色;菌柄细长,被灰色纤丝状至粉状鳞片,基部不膨大;菌幕残余(菌托)灰色至深灰色,粉质,不规则排列或呈带状;菌环缺如。
在我国,过去一般将菌柄基部不膨大、菌托多少呈圈状的鹅膏,定为“圈托鹅膏”,其拉丁学名常用 Amanita inaurata Secr.、Amanita strangulata (Fr.) Quel. 或 Amanitopsis strangulata Fr.,近来也见有用 Amanita ceciliae (Berk. & Broome) Bas 的(Teng 1932a, 1936;邓叔群1963;应建浙和臧穆1994;Teng 1996;Yang 1997;卯晓岚1998)。值得指出的是,Secretan(1833)发表的名称属不合格发表(Greuter et al. 2000),所以 Amanita inaurata Secr. 这一名称是不能使用的。Amanita inaurata Secr. ex Gillet 虽然是合格的,但它是 Agaricus ceciliae Berk. & Broome [= Amanita ceciliae (Berk. & Broome) Bas] 的晚出异名(Bas 1984)。根据 Bas(1984)的意见,Amanita strangulata (Fr.) Quel. [= Amanitopsis strangulata Fr.] 是个有菌环的种,具体是什么尚不清楚。因此,欧洲的“圈托鹅膏”目前一般使用“Amanita ceciliae (Berk. & Broome) Bas”这一拉丁名。
圈托鹅膏 A. ceciliae 原初描述于欧洲,它的菌柄粗壮,菌盖常带黄色色调,菌盖菌肉较厚,菌褶白色,干后不变为灰色,菌幕残余(菌托)常呈环带状;菌盖表面的菌幕残余中菌丝较多(Phillips 1990; Breitenbach & Kränzlin 1995)。近来的研究表明,我国过去文献中记载的“圈托鹅膏”可能包囊了至少两个种,即李逵鹅膏(A. liquii Zhu L. Yang et al.)和灰褶鹅膏,这二者的区别可见本志鞘托鹅膏组 sect. Vaginatae 分种检索表。
李惠中等162(HMAS 35975)包括了两个种的标本,李惠中等162a(HMAS 35975a)是褐烟色鹅膏 A. brunneofuliginea Zhu L. Yang。

序列信息

如何下载序列?

分子类型 标本号 Version No. 序列 文献 来源地
DNAHKAS 38159 (Zhu L. Yang 3081)[主模式]AY436448ITS中国 云南省 Kunming , Heilongtan 1980 m asl ., on soil in forest dominated by Quercus sp ., Pinus armandi , and P . yunnanensis

涉及该物种的相关文献

  1. 云南野生菌

    ,

    2022. 杨祝良、王向华、吴刚编著. 北京:科学出版社

       
  2. The family Amanitaceae: molecular phylogeny, higher-rank taxonomy and the species in China

    ,

    2018. Cui, Y.-Y., Cai, Q., Tang, L.-P., Liu, J.-W., & Yang, Z. L.. Fungal Diversity, 91(1), 5–230.

        https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0405-9
  3. 鄂西地区大型真菌多样性研究

    ,

    2019. 王锋尖. 吉林农业大学博士学位论文

        https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CDFD&dbname=CDFDLAST2020&filename=1019926005.nh&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=owmnd-0BLb_PRxBS7Z-W_PKzuIELr_jHiWFnQx-Sor9vRjnRiu8iimcT2XTFlGOH
  4. 中国热带真菌

    ,

    2010. 吴兴亮、戴玉成、李泰辉、杨祝良、宋斌. 北京:科学出版社

       
  5. 常见蘑菇野外识别手册

    ,

    2010. 肖波,范宇光. 重庆:重庆大学出版社

       
  6. 中国真菌志 第27卷 鹅膏科

    ,

    2005. 杨祝良主编. 北京:科学出版社

       
  7. 中国鹅膏科真菌图志

    ,

    2015. 杨祝良. 北京:科学出版社

       
  8. Two new species of Amanita (Basidiomycota) from China

    ,

    2004. Zhu L. Yang. Agerer R, Piepenbring M, Blanz P (eds) Frontiers in Basidiomycete mycology. IHW Verlag, Eching, pp 315–324

       

本词条的创作得到了共同创作者 龙栩川 的帮助。

感谢共同创作者整理物种列表、撰写内容或给出专业性指导!